Skip to main content
· 1/27/1998

Ike v. Doolittle

Citations

  • 61 Cal. App. 4th 51
  • 70 Cal. Rptr. 2d 887
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 949
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 756
  • 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding clear and convincing evidence of settlor’s intent through (1) testimony of drafter, (2) expert testimony on tax savings, (3) five supporting witnesses, and (4) the trust
  • reforming ambiguous trust provisions based on extrinsic evidence of two settlors’ shared intent
  • reforming based on drafting error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nares

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.