Skip to main content
· 12/15/2005

IIG Capital LLC v. Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch, LLP (In Re Amanat)

Citations

  • 338 B.R. 574
  • 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2845
  • 2005 WL 3789328

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Many cases have held that a bankruptcy court has ‘related to’ jurisdiction over non-debtor litigation if the estate is obligated to indemnify or contribute to the losing party.”
  • “Although cases have found certain proceedings to be core based on their overall impact on the estate, e.g., United States Lines, Inc. v. Am, S.S. Owners Mut. Prot. & Indem. Assoc., Inc. (In re United States Lines, Inc.), 197 F.3d 631 (2d Cir. 1999
  • “Although cases have found certain proceedings to be core based on their overall impact on the estate, . . . there is no authority that a party with a contingent claim for indemnification can bootstrap its claim onto the Bankruptcy Court’s core jurisdiction.”
  • collecting cases related to bankruptcy courts’ jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allan L. Gropper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.