Iida v. Kitahara (In Re Iida)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Chapter 15 differs from the Model Law in requiring recognition prior to relief
• “This public policy exception is narrow and, by virtue of the qualifier ‘manifestly,’ is limited only to the most fundamental policies of the United States”
• addressing § 1506 18 objection raised by two Japanese citizens

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).