Skip to main content
· 2/7/1986

Ihedioha Eze v. Yellow Cab Company of Alexandria, Va., Inc.

Citations

  • 782 F.2d 1064
  • 251 U.S. App. D.C. 206
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires complete diversity
  • plaintiffs had abundant notice of the jurisdictional defect urged in support of motion to dismiss and district court's dismissal of the complaint was proper
  • “[U]nder long-held precedent, diversity must be ‘complete.’. . . A diversity suit, in line with the Strawbridge rule, may not be maintained in federal court by an alien against a citizen of a state and a citizen of some other foreign country.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Ginsburg, Fairchild, Seventh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.