Ihar Sotnikau v. Loretta Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that criminal manslaughter was not a CIMT because a conviction could be predicated on criminal negligence
• noting that if the elements of the crime at issue “can include behavior that does not involve moral turpitude, the crime is not categorically one involving moral turpitude”
• \We look at the elements of the crime at issue and determine whether those elements solely encompass behavior that involves moral turpitude.\
• “To involve moral turpitude, a crime requires two essential elements:, a culpable mental state and reprehensible conduct.”
• “We look at the elements of the crime at issue and determine whether those elements solely encompass behavior that involves moral turpitude.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).