Igor Zavalin v. Carolyn W. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an RFC of simple, routine, and repetitive tasks conflicts with jobs requiring Level 3 reasoning
• holding that there was an apparent conflict between the RFC to perform simple, repetitive tasks and the demands of Level 3 Reasoning
• holding that an RFC limited to “simple, routine, or repetitive work” does not conflict with the ability to perform Reasoning Level 2 positions
• holding that “there is an apparent conflict between the residual functional capacity to 7 perform simple, repetitive tasks, and the demands of Level 3 Reasoning”
• holding that “there is an apparent conflict between the 22 residual functional capacity to perform simple, repetitive tasks, and the demands of Level 3 23 Reasoning”
• holding that “there is an apparent conflict between the 20 21 residual functional capacity to perform simple, repetitive tasks, and the demands of Level 3 22 Reasoning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).