Skip to main content
· 2/14/2018

IFRAIN MONDEJA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Citations

  • 241 So. 3d 907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s interpretation of the meaning of “when required” in the statute although “conceivable” was unreasonable in part because it undermined the purpose of the traffic law and public safety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.