Skip to main content
· 9/17/2009

Ifill v. New York State Court Officers Ass'n

Citations

  • 655 F. Supp. 2d 382
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85375
  • 2009 WL 2981961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Courts have generally construed the six-month limitations period found in 29 U.S.C. § 160(b) to refer to six calendar months rather than 180 days.”
  • “Under New York law, a union member has no cause of action against his union for breach of a collective bargaining agreement between his employer and his union.”
  • “[T]he date on which [the plaintiff] knew or should have known that the [union] allegedly breached its duty of fair representation is the same date on which he suffered actual harm . . . the date he was allegedly forced to resign.”
  • “[T]he date on which [the plaintiff] knew or should have known that the [union] allegedly breached its duty of fair representation is the same date on which he suffered actual harm . . . the date he was allegedly forced to resign.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John G. Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.