Ids Life Insurance Company v. Sunamerica Life Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that parent corporations not liable for subsidiaries’ tor-tious acts and not subject to jurisdiction under tort provision of long-arm statute “unless there is a basis for piercing the corporate veil”
• stating allegations parents “controlled, directed, and supervised” subsidiaries would be insufficient, without a basis for piercing the corporate veil, to attribute subsidiaries’ actions to the parent
• noting that “[v]erified complaints[ are] the equivalent of affidavits”
• finding that a provision of an injunction No. 06-3012 7 that enjoins the defendant from inducing the plaintiffs’ sales agents and former sales agents to engage in “unlaw- ful insurance practices” but failing to specify the prac- tices does not comply with Rule 65(d)
• noting that “[v]erified complaints[ are] the equivalent of affidavits”
• noting that “[v]erified complaints [are] the equivalent of affidavits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).