· 5/23/1966
Ideal Toy Corporation v. Fab-Lu Ltd. (Inc.) and David Faber
Citations
- 360 F.2d 1021
- 149 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 800
- 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6054
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Court emphasized \distinct differences\ with respect to features of dolls in finding no infringement
- Court emphasized “distinct differences” with respect to features of dolls in finding no infringement
- determination of \substantial similarity\ for purposes of infringement is a factual question
- determination of “substantial similarity” for purposes of infringement is a factual question
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feinberg, Lumbard, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.