Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiffs have failed to show a basis for recusal, as their allegations fail to demonstrate any deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment impossible... as opposed to disagreement with decisions made by [the] Judge in his judicial role.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).