Idaho Aids Foundation, Inc. v. Idaho Housing & Finance Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that HUD was a necessary party under Rule 19(a) where state housing authority’s alleged violation of plaintiffs constitutional right to privacy hinged on HUD’s order that housing authority get “unfettered access” to tenants’ medical records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).