Ida MORELLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CEDEL, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “[i]n determining whether [a defendant] satisfies the ADEA’s 20-employee threshold, employees cannot be ignored merely because they work overseas.”
• concluding that the ADEA covers a U.S.-based branch of a foreign employer
• finding that the ADA, Title VII, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act “apply to a foreign company’s domestic operations”
• propriety of subjecting defendant to Title VII liability best judged by the impact on defendant’s worldwide operations
• “[T]he plain language of the corresponding foreign-employer exclusions in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA
• “The other 1984 amendments ... conform to the ADEA’s reach to “the well-established principle of sovereignty, that no nation has the right to impose its labor standards on another country.” ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).