Ida Maxwell Wells v. G. Gordon Liddy, Phillip MacKin Bailley, Movant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a federal court sitting in diversity must apply the choice-of-law rules from the forum state”
• “A federal court sitting in diversity must apply the choice-of-law rules from the forum state.”
• “As a court sitting in diversity, we have an obligation to interpret the law in accordance with the Court of Appeals of Maryland, or where the law is unclear, as it appears that the Court of Appeals would rule.”
• “As a court sitting in diversity, we have an obligation to interpret the law in accordance with the Court of Appeals of Maryland, or where the law is unclear, as it appears that the Court of Appeals would rule.”
• “As a court sitting in diversity, we have an obligation to interpret the law in accordance with the Court of Appeals of Maryland, or where the law is unclear, as it appears that the Court of Appeals would rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).