ID Security Systems Canada, Inc. v. Checkpoint Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding unfair competition where competitor tortiously interfered with contract and gained advantage over direct competitor
• finding unfair competition where competitor tortiously interfered with contract and gained advantage over direct competitor
• relying on the Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition § 1 cmt. g for guidance, which states: “As a general matter, if the means of competition are otherwise tortious with respect to the injured party, they will also ordinarily constitute an unfair method of competition.”
• “As a matter of law, a market share of less than 30 percent is presumptively insufficient to establish the market power that is a prerequisite to a defendant’s enjoying a dangerous probability of achieving monopoly power.”
• “Although no Pennsylvania appellate court has formally recognized the common law tort of unfair competition, several lower state and federal courts have recognized the existence of a cause of action for unfair competition under some circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).