· 6/7/1993
Ice Cold Auto Air of Clearwater, Inc. v. Cold Air & Accessories, Inc.
Citations
- 828 F. Supp. 925
- 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15250
- 1993 WL 276472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding “Ice Cold Auto Air” descriptive of a company that provides auto air condition services
- “Although the [c]ourt rejects [the plaintiff]’s argument that the marks are suggestive, [it] is still entitled to a presumption that the marks are descriptive with secondary meaning.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.