Skip to main content
· 6/7/1993

Ice Cold Auto Air of Clearwater, Inc. v. Cold Air & Accessories, Inc.

Citations

  • 828 F. Supp. 925
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15250
  • 1993 WL 276472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “Ice Cold Auto Air” descriptive of a company that provides auto air condition services
  • “Although the [c]ourt rejects [the plaintiff]’s argument that the marks are suggestive, [it] is still entitled to a presumption that the marks are descriptive with secondary meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.