· 8/16/1988
Ibrahim v. New York State Department of Health
Citations
- 692 F. Supp. 1471
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9272
- 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,411
- 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1076
- 1988 WL 86944
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- NYSDHR’s findings have preclusive effect even though complainant was pro se in administrative adjudication, no judicial-style hearing was held, and a decision was reached on the basis of an incomplete record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dearie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.