Skip to main content
· 8/16/1988

Ibrahim v. New York State Department of Health

Citations

  • 692 F. Supp. 1471
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9272
  • 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,411
  • 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1076
  • 1988 WL 86944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • NYSDHR’s findings have preclusive effect even though complainant was pro se in administrative adjudication, no judicial-style hearing was held, and a decision was reached on the basis of an incomplete record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dearie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.