Skip to main content
· 1/11/1993

Ibrahim Silwany-Rodriguez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 975 F.2d 1157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an asylum application in a removal proceeding is considered a new application
  • “[Our de novo review] is limited, and the court accords deference to the Board’s interpretation of immigration statutes unless there are compelling indications that the Board’s interpretation is wrong.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Duhé, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.