IBF Participating Income Fund v. Dillard-Winecoff, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying 12 the three factors from New Hampshire as being “pertinent to the decision whether to apply the doctrine [of judicial estoppel] in a particular case” (citations and punctuation omitted)
• pointing out that “judicial estoppel is an equitable doctrine that prevents a party from asserting a claim in a legal proceeding that is inconsistent with a claim taken by that party in a previous proceeding”
• doctrine of judicial estoppel did not apply where prior bankruptcy proceeding concluded in dismissal of the debtor’s petition “because no benefit or unfair advantage result[ed] from [the] dismissal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).