Ibarra v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing first party benefits, despite the prohibition in Section 1714, to wife who did not have ownership interest in vehicle, even though estranged husband failed to obtain insurance
• providing first party benefits, despite the prohibition in Section 1714, to wife who did not have ownership interest in vehicle, even though estranged husband failed to obtain insurance
• insured who was driving uninsured vehicle that was titled solely in her estranged husband’s name was neither an owner of the vehicle nor did she have a property interest in the vehicle so as to preclude her recovery of first-party benefits under her policy of insurance on another vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).