· 5/15/1987
Ibarbia v. Regents of University of California
Citations
- 191 Cal. App. 3d 1318
- 237 Cal. Rptr. 92
- 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1724
- 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,409
- 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 645
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- FEHA claim resolved by examining federal Title VII law
- “To establish a prima facie case of 25 employment discrimination through disparate impact . . . plaintiff need not show that the 26 employer had a discriminatory intent but need only demonstrate that a particular practice in 27 actuality operates to exclude members of [her gender]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Merrill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.