Skip to main content
· 5/15/1987

Ibarbia v. Regents of University of California

Citations

  • 191 Cal. App. 3d 1318
  • 237 Cal. Rptr. 92
  • 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1724
  • 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,409
  • 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • FEHA claim resolved by examining federal Title VII law
  • “To establish a prima facie case of 25 employment discrimination through disparate impact . . . plaintiff need not show that the 26 employer had a discriminatory intent but need only demonstrate that a particular practice in 27 actuality operates to exclude members of [her gender]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merrill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.