Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/18/2000
Ianicelli v. Peterson
Citations
- 102 Wash. App. 456
- 9 P.3d 845
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Will contests are statutory proceedings and courts must be governed by the provisions of the applicable statutes,” rather than by the rules of civil procedure (internal quotations and citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ader v. Estate of FelgerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-05-27· cited 44×
- In Re Estate of DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-03-27· cited 40×
- Witt v. Port of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-04-05· cited 40×
- In Re Estate of PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-09-15· cited 18×
- Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-12-04· cited 18×
- Estate of Jepsen v. MilesWashington Supreme Court· 2015-09-24· cited 13×
- Ricketts v. Board of AccountancyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-08· cited 13×
- Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-03· cited 11×
- In Re Estate of JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-03· cited 8×
- ROCKETTS v. State Bd. of AccountancyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-08· cited 2×
- In Re Estate of KordonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-17· cited 2×
- Fontana v. Diocese of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-05-03· cited 2×
- Todric Corp. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-11· cited 2×
- Cleveland v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-17· cited 2×
- Valentine v. ElliottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-03-27· cited 1×
- In re Estate of JepsenWashington Supreme Court· 2015-09-24
- Ianicelli v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-18
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court· 1971-03-25· cited 1,211×
- CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 192×
- C.J.C. v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 180×
- Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 137×
- Matter of Estate of LintWashington Supreme Court· 1998-07-09· cited 134×
- Murphy v. LintWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 133×
- Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court· 1969-04-10· cited 121×
- Vestron, Inc. v. Home Box Office Inc., and Hbo Video, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1988-02-24· cited 54×
- Kearney v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-09· cited 46×
- Meridian Minerals Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-06-12· cited 37×
- State ex rel. Wood v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1913-10-10· cited 36×
- Beard v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-02-13· cited 31×
- Meridian Minerals Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1991-10-01· cited 30×
- Hoscheid v. BartholetWashington Supreme Court· 1914-02-28· cited 30×
- In re the Estate of TothWashington Supreme Court· 1999-08-05· cited 28×
- In Re Estate of TothWashington Supreme Court· 1999-08-05· cited 26×
- In the Matter of Estate of Van DykeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-05-22· cited 19×
- Horton v. BartoWashington Supreme Court· 1910-02-25· cited 12×
- In Re Estate of BarrWashington Supreme Court· 1969-05-22· cited 9×
- E.R.B. v. Church of GodCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-30· cited 5×
Other cases named Ianicelli v. Peterson
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.