Skip to main content
· 2/16/1984

I.A.M. National Pension Fund Benefit Plan C and Alan W. Skolnick v. Stockton Tri Industries

Citations

  • 727 F.2d 1204
  • 234 U.S. App. D.C. 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • likening review of an arbitrator in this context to review of an administrative agency and recognizing that Congress expressed a preference for “initial resolution of the dispute in a non-judicial forum”
  • \Congress knows how to withdraw jurisdiction expressly when that is its purpose.\
  • \Congress knows how to withdraw jurisdiction expressly when that is its purpose\
  • “Congress knows how to withdraw jurisdiction expressly when that is its purpose.”
  • “Congress knows how to withdraw jurisdiction expressly when that is its purpose”
  • “We presume exhaustion is non-jurisdictional unless ‘Congress states in clear, unequivocal terms that the judiciary is barred from hearing an action until the administrative agency has come to a decision.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Edwards, Starr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.