Skip to main content
· 12/2/2015

Iain and Natasha McMillan v. The Bank of New York Mellon

Citations

  • 180 So. 3d 1090
  • 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18024
  • 2015 WL 7752810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the foreclosure judgment, but reversing as to the amounts in the final judgment where there was evidence, albeit inadmissible, supporting the amount of indebtedness
  • remanding for further proceedings to determine the amounts owed in a case where the bank presented witness testimony as to the exact amounts owed but did not produce the actual business records to substantiate those figures
  • affirming the foreclosure judgment, but reversing as to the amounts in the final judgment relating to certain forms of damages that were not proven by competent substantial evidence, and remanding “for further proceedings to determine the amounts owed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klingensmith, Damoorgían, Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.