I4I v. Microsoft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting \erroneously instructing the jury on an element” of an offense is not a structural error (citing Yates v. Evatt
• “[Congress] did not mean to preempt only state laws specifically designed to affect employee benefit plans.\ FMC Corp.
• noting that the state court's decision that the petitioner failed to show Strickland prejudice could not have been \contrary to [ Arizona v. ] Fulminante
• noting that the state court's decision that the petitioner failed to show Strickland prejudice could not have been \contrary to [ Arizona v. ] Fulminante
• \Previous opinions of this Court have employed the term ‘mental retardation.’ This opinion uses the term ‘intellectual disability’ to describe the identical phenomenon.” (citing Rosa's Law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).