I. Meyer Pincus & Associates, P.C. v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a prospectus integral to the complaint, “despite the fact that the complaint contains only ‘limited quotation’ from that document” because the claims pleaded therein were based on an alleged misrepresentation in the document (internal citation omitted)
• where claims were based only on an alleged written misrepresentation appearing within the prosper-tus and not in any other source
• it is proper to consider a document upon which allegations are based, whether or not it is attached to the complaint
• “the prospectus states exactly the ‘fact’ that [the plaintiff] contends has been covered up”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).