Skip to main content
· 4/27/1959

Hyyppa v. United States

Citations

  • 359 U.S. 978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that unresolved calculation of “the precise amount of backpay ... was, therefore, a ‘ministerial’ detail, such as would not have prevented the [award] from being deemed final”
  • “If the company wanted an unrestricted right of subcontracting it should have written it into the management-rights clause or created an express exception to the arbitration clause....”
  • precise amount of backpay could be determined “automatically” without judgment or discretion by resort to company’s records and this “ministerial” detail did not preclude finality
  • precise amount of backpay could be determined “automatically” without judgment or discretion by resort to company’s records and this “ministerial” detail did not preclude finality
  • precise amount of backpay could be determined “automatically” without judgment or discretion by resort to company’s records and this “ministerial” detail did not preclude finality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.