HYUNDAI MOTOR FINANCE CO. v. McKAY MOTORS I, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the arguments in a Rule 50(b) renewed motion must match those “asserted in support of the pre-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a)”
• “Although technical precision in stating the grounds for a motion for judgment of a matter of law is not necessary, the motion must be specific enough to notify the district court and the opposing party of the underlying issue.”
• “If the amount of damages was in fact uncontested, [plaintiff ] should have moved for the district court to decide that issue as a matter of law before the case was submitted to 10 Case: 19-30320 Document: 00515486215 Page: 11 Date Filed: 07/13/2020 No. 19-30320 the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).