· 6/10/1999
Hyundai Motor Co. v. Rodriguez Ex Rel. Rodriguez
Citations
- 995 S.W.2d 661
- 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 738
- 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 665
- 1999 Tex. LEXIS 58
- 1999 WL 374111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that \`defect'\ in cookie at issue in claims for strict liability and breach of an implied warranty of merchantability were functionally identical
- concluding that “ ‘defect’ ” in cookie at issue in claims for strict liability and breach of an implied warranty of merchantability were functionally identical
- holding that to preserve error regarding the exclusion of evidence, both the offer of the evidence and the adverse ruling must appear in the record
- holding that trial court “must submit in its charge to the jury all questions, instructions, and definitions raised by the pleadings and evidence”
- holding that to preserve error regarding the exclusion of evidence, both the offer of the evidence and the adverse ruling must appear in the record
- recognizing that whether a defect exists for breach of an implied warranty of merchantability and for strict liability involves an identical factual determination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hecht
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.