Hyta v. Finley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellate court could sua sponte raise issue of whether an underlying contract was illegal
• holding, in a partnership dissolution action involving a bar that primarily profited from illegal gaming machines, appellate court could sua sponte raise issue of whether underlying contract was illegal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Atlantic Coast Builders & Contractors, LLC v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-05-16· cited 154×
• Ward v. West Oil Co., Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-04-12· cited 11×
• Disotell v. Stiltner
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2004-11-05· cited 10×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stearns v. Williams
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1952-01-31· cited 88×
• Miller v. Haller
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1996-09-03· cited 68×
• Quiring v. Quiring
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1997-09-02· cited 48×
• Nab v. Hills
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 30×
• Kelly v. Silverwood Estates
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-09-28· cited 24×
• Ramseyer v. Ramseyer
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1976-12-29· cited 22×
• Arnold v. Burgess
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1987-12-03· cited 8×
• Heileson v. Cook
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-03-29· cited 6×
• Mays v. Davis
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1998-10-22· cited 6×
• Belt v. Belt
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1984-04-10· cited 6×