Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Commerce “concedes that Plaintiffs’ method of amortizing and deferring R&D costs is permissible under Korean GAAP”
• noting that Dr. Jhabvala’s memorandum was originally prepared for use in Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Static Random Access Memory Semiconductors From the Republic of Korea, 63 Fed.Reg. 8,934, 8,939-40 (Feb. 23, 1998
• noting that Hynix involved the sixth administrative review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).