Skip to main content
· 3/9/1973

Hymen Schlesinger and David A. Hensler v. Hon. Hubert Teitelbaum, United States District Judge

Citations

  • 475 F.2d 137
  • 1973 A.M.C. 2038
  • 17 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The district courts' supervisory jurisdiction over contingent fee contracts for services rendered in cases before them is well-established\
  • “The district courts’ supervisory jurisdiction over contingent fee contracts for services rendered in cases before them is well-established”
  • “[I]n its supervisory power over the members of its bar, a court has jurisdiction of certain activities of such members, including the charges of contingent fees.”
  • “[I]n its supervisory power over the members of its bar, a court has jurisdiction of certain activities of such members, including the charges of contingent fees.”
  • “[I]n its supervisory power over the members of its bar, a court has jurisdiction of certain activities of such members, including the charges of contingent fees.”
  • \The sum determined to be a reasonable attorney's fee is within the discretion of the district court; before a reviewing court should disturb the holding there should be a clear showing that the trial judge abused his discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Dusen, Adams, Barlow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.