Hylla v. Transportation Communications International Union

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party may not present new legal arguments or theories in an objection to an R&R
• finding that the content of the union member’s speech, which consisted of profanity toward a superior and a threat toward another employee, was not of union concern
• “[T]he threshold inquiry in the LMRDA context is whether the speech at issue may be fairly characterized as a matter of union concern.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).