Skip to main content
· 3/1/2011

HYE RA HAN v. Holloway

Citations

  • 945 N.E.2d 45
  • 408 Ill. App. 3d 387
  • 348 Ill. Dec. 738
  • 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that without a transcript of the plaintiff’s trial testimony, the appellate court could not determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion for new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.