Skip to main content
· 4/20/1984

Hydroflo Corp. v. First Nat. Bank of Omaha

Citations

  • 349 N.W.2d 615
  • 217 Neb. 20
  • 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 932
  • 49 A.L.R. 4th 873
  • 1984 Neb. LEXIS 1042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the issue of whether a bank has acted in a commercially reasonable manner is a question of fact, and where reasonable minds could differ as to the conclusions or inferences to be drawn from the evidence, such issues must be submitted to the jury
  • noting the Department of Banking and Finance had general supervision and control over the bank as well as a duty to aid banks in maintaining proper banking standards and efficiency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.