· 4/20/1984
Hydroflo Corp. v. First Nat. Bank of Omaha
Citations
- 349 N.W.2d 615
- 217 Neb. 20
- 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 932
- 49 A.L.R. 4th 873
- 1984 Neb. LEXIS 1042
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the issue of whether a bank has acted in a commercially reasonable manner is a question of fact, and where reasonable minds could differ as to the conclusions or inferences to be drawn from the evidence, such issues must be submitted to the jury
- noting the Department of Banking and Finance had general supervision and control over the bank as well as a duty to aid banks in maintaining proper banking standards and efficiency
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.