Hydrick v. Hunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[e]ven under a ‘deliberate indifference’ theory of individual liability, the Plaintiffs must still allege sufficient facts to plausibly establish the defendant’s ‘knowledge of and ‘acquiescence in’ the unconstitutional conduct of his subordinates”
• stating that civilly committed SVPs undergo a five-phase treatment program and that 6 conditional release is granted if phase five is completed
• suing Defendant Robertson, the former Warden, and 4 Defendant Smith, the current Acting Warden
• suing Defendant Robertson, the 27 former Warden, and Defendant Smith, the current Acting Warden
• “Qualified immunity is only an immunity from a suit for money damages, and does not provide immunity from a suit seeking declaratory or injunctive relief.”
• qualified immunity is only from suits for damages, “[c]laims for injunctive and declaratory relief are unaffected by qualified immunity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).