Hyden v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• turning to the Russian Constitution to determine “whether the Government and the Russian Federation should be treated as separate parties for the purposes of this confirmation proceeding”
• enforcing arbitration award against Russian government even though a political organ was named in the actual arbitration
• “the [political organ] owns no assets that could be attached to satisfy a judgment confirming the [arbitration award]”
• “[T]he fact of an internal separation of some sort between the sovereign and one or more of its organs [is] of no legal significance.”
• “Numerous other courts have assumed without discussion that governmental departments or ministries ... qualify as political subdivisions of a foreign state under the FSIA.” (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “‘[T]he public policy in favor of international arbitration is strong.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).