Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/22/2024

Hyden v. Anderson

Citations

242 N.E.3d 152
2024 Ohio 1578

Syllabus

plaintiff sought residual diminution in value of vehicle after collision repairs were paid by defendant recovery capped at primary measure of damages, which is fair market value immediately before injury minus the fair market value immediately after injury post-repair value is not a substitute for pre-repair value.

Judges: Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied Companies
Ohio Supreme Court· 1993-09-15· cited 490×
Columbus Finance, Inc. v. Howard
Ohio Supreme Court· 1975-04-30· cited 203×
Pryor v. Webber
Ohio Supreme Court· 1970-09-23· cited 115×
Rakich v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2007-07-24· cited 21×
Masheter v. Kebe
Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-12-30· cited 18×
American Service Center Associates v. Helton
District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-02-03· cited 13×
Masheter v. Cleveland Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court· 1969-02-19· cited 3×
Gough-Northrup v. Hammonds
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-05· cited 2×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.