Hyde v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even if similar transaction evidence is improperly admitted, harm as well as error must be shown to obtain reversal
• “The rule is that the scope of review is limited to the scope of the ruling in the trial court as shown by the trial record and cannot be enlarged or transformed through a process of switching or shifting [arguments].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schneider v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-10-26· cited 16×
• Kirt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-03-22· cited 11×
• Holden v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-08· cited 8×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-02-19· cited 4×
• Eugene Smith v. Ray Laney
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-03-16

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Parrish v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-03-11· cited 68×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-11-02· cited 46×
• Ellis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-10-02· cited 29×
• Porter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-12-03· cited 17×
• Shuman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-06-07· cited 16×
• Garcia v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-02-25· cited 7×
• Lashley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-09-04· cited 6×
• Cornell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-12-19· cited 5×
• Griffin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-03-03· cited 4×