Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott Laboratories

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the grant oí a preliminary injunction was based on more than an unwarranted presumption of irreparable harm where the district court found the patentee would suffer lost market position and obstructed business relationships in the market
• noting that a “period of delay” constitutes “one factor to be considered by a district court in its analysis of irreparable harm”
• concluding injunctive relief under § 283 is governed by the law of the Federal Circuit, not regional circuits
• concluding injunctive relief under § 283 is governed by the law of the Federal Circuit, not regional circuits
• affirming a decision not to enjoin the production of infringing hepatitis and cancer test kits
• affirming a decision not to enjoin the production of infringing hepatitis and cancer test kits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

220 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-06-15· cited 449×
• amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2001-02-14· cited 435×
• Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1997-05-12· cited 283×
• Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1999-05-05· cited 262×
• K-V Pharmaceutical Co. v. J. Uriach & CIA, S.A.
  Eighth Circuit· 2011-08-03· cited 250×
• Reebok International Ltd. v. J. Baker, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1994-08-15· cited 195×
• Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-06-03· cited 174×
• Biodex Corporation v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1991-10-03· cited 174×
• Bell & Howell Document Management Products Company v. Altek Systems, and Keystone Jackets, Inc. And George Wrabel
  Federal Circuit· 1998-01-06· cited 170×
• Standard Havens Products, Inc. v. Gencor Industries, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1990-02-23· cited 160×
• High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-03-06· cited 152×
• Tate Access Floors, Inc. And Tate Access Floors Leasing, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Resources, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2002-02-07· cited 145×
• Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-10-21· cited 141×
• Intel Corporation v. Ulsi System Technology, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1993-08-26· cited 139×
• Jack Guttman, Inc. v. Kopykake Enterprises, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2002-08-30· cited 128×
• Polymer Technologies, Inc., and Walter Polovina v. Andrew P. Bridwell, H.A. Spec. Co., and Westmark Ag Group, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-12-23· cited 123×
• Bio-Technology General Corp. And Bio-Technology General (Israel), Ltd. v. Genentech, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-05-20· cited 119×
• Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. Depuy-Motech, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-01-24· cited 109×
• Mikohn Gaming Corporation v. Acres Gaming, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-12-30· cited 108×
• Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc., Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novo Nordisk, A/s v. Genentech, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-04-16· cited 107×

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation
  Supreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 2,250×
• Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1986-09-19· cited 449×
• W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1983-11-14· cited 366×
• Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-Appellants
  Federal Circuit· 1985-12-17· cited 365×
• Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1985-03-04· cited 349×
• Moleculon Research Corporation v. Cbs, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1986-05-16· cited 283×
• Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1984-09-25· cited 279×
• Shatterproof Glass Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Libbey-Owens Ford Company and Leybold-Heraeus Gmbh, Appellants/cross-Appellees
  Federal Circuit· 1985-03-29· cited 243×
• Smith International, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1983-10-06· cited 203×
• Gte Corporation v. David R. Williams, D/B/A General Telephone
  Tenth Circuit· 1984-04-06· cited 182×
• H.H. Robertson, Company v. United Steel Deck, Inc. And Nicholas J. Bouras, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1987-05-27· cited 175×
• Mannesmann Demag Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Engineered Metal Products Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1986-06-12· cited 171×
• Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1986-12-05· cited 170×
• Roper Corporation v. Litton Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1985-03-15· cited 119×
• Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc. v. Hybritech, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1987-03-30· cited 113×
• Nifong v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1983-11-28· cited 109×
• Smith v. Hall
  Supreme Court· 1937-04-26· cited 106×
• Ideal Industries, Inc. v. Gardner Bender, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1980-01-28· cited 100×
• Atlas Powder Company v. Ireco Chemicals
  Federal Circuit· 1985-09-23· cited 95×
• CBS Inc. v. Moleculon Research Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1987-01-12· cited 90×