Hyatt v. Director, Patent and Trademark Office

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Exception to final judgment rules exists where “there is a substantial risk that the PTO will permanently lose its ability to challenge the district court’s” decision.
• Exception to final judgment rules exists where “there is a substantial risk that the PTO will permanently lose its ability to challenge the district court’s” decision.
• “An agency’s interpretation of its own regulation is entitled to substantial deference, and the reviewing court should give effect to the agency’s interpretation so long as it is reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).