Hyatt International Corp. v. Gerardo Coco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the parties “entire course of contact” with respect to a business endeavor were relevant to the minimum-contacts analysis, and rejecting defendant’s attempt to “dissect[]” their dealings “into two purportedly unrelated events”
• “[T]here is no operative difference between the limits imposed by the Illinois Constitution and the federal limitations on personal jurisdiction”
• because the plaintiff did not assert that Illinois could assert general jurisdiction, “we consider only the propriety of specific jurisdiction-, a more limited assertion of state power”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).