Hyatt Corporation, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the requirement that an agency state its reasons for a decision ‘imposes a discipline on the agency which prevents haphazard or arbitrary administrative action’”
• “Courts are not at liberty to speculate on the basis of an administrative agency’s order.... [nor is the court] free to accept ‘appellate counsel’s rationalization for agency action in lieu of reasons and findings enunciated by the Board.’ ”
• “Courts are not at liberty to speculate on the basis of an administrative agency’s order. . . . [nor is the court] free to accept ‘appellate counsel’s rationalization for agency action in lieu of reasons and findings enunciated by the Board.’”
• “Courts are not at liberty to speculate on the basis of an administrative agency’s order. . . . [nor is the court] free to accept ‘appellate counsel’s rationalization for agency action in lieu of reasons and findings enunciated by the Board.’”
• “Courts are not at liberty to speculate on the basis of an administrative agency’s order. . . . [nor is the court] free to accept ‘appellate counsel’s rationalization for agency action in lieu of reasons and findings enunciated by the Board.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).