Hyatt Corp. v. Stanton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an action was “not removable under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(d)” because the removing party was “not a foreign state under the FSIA”
• finding definition of “political subdivision” in O’Connell too broad and suggesting the case should be limited to its facts and not applied widely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).