H.W. v. Comal Indep Sch Dist

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial judge’s exclusion of Adjutant evidence was proper because victim had admitted that he was first aggressor
• no error in excluding proposed Adjutant evidence where identity of first aggressor not in dispute
• evidence of victim’s prior violent acts “immaterial” where contested issues had nothing to do with identity of first aggressor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).