Hvass v. Graven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the timing of a motion to intervene, 8 filed after the parties had come to an agreement following five years of litigation, weighed heavily 9 against permitting intervention even though the agreement had not yet been officially approved 10 by the district court
• emphasizing \ 'the seriousness of the prejudice which results when relief from long-standing inequities is delayed' \
• \[T]he possibility of this settlement unraveling is so prejudicial that to allow the [city] to intervene at this late date would be tantamount to disaster\
• multiple parties reached complex arrangement regarding future development of commercial airline activity at John Wayne Airport
• fact that proposed intervenor waited until all the 9 parties had come to an agreement after five years of litigation weighed heavily against 10 intervention
• unsuccessful applicant for intervention not precluded from taking other action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).