Huyghe v. Brinkman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that notice containing an inaccurately inflated amount-to-cure is deficient when the mortgagee included an item in the notice that “a reader could have interpreted . . . as requiring a payment . . . more than that actually required to cure the borrower’s default”
• holding that notice containing an inaccurately inflated amount-to-cure is deficient when the mortgagee included an item in the notice that “a reader could have interpreted . . . as requiring a payment . . . more than that actually required to cure the borrower’s default”
• granting judgment for defendant on foreclosure count where plaintiff failed to prove strict compliance with the ostensibly procedural but practically substantive notice requirement found in 14 M.R.S. § 6111

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).