Hutts v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because defense counsel did not specifically challenge the sufficiency of the accomplice-corroboration evidence, the argument was not preserved for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McCoy v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-03-14· cited 50×
• Tillman v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-11-17· cited 45×
• Jenkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-05-16· cited 15×
• Box v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2001-06-06· cited 5×
• Breshears v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-10-01· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Abdullah v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-01-29· cited 62×
• Byrd v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-06-10· cited 33×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-11-21· cited 22×
• Ladwig v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-04-28· cited 20×