Skip to main content
· 3/3/2005

Hutto v. Francisco

Citations

  • 107 P.3d 934
  • 210 Ariz. 88
  • 446 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
  • 2005 Ariz. App. LEXIS 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that statutory language establishing a general principle that motor vehicles be “safely maintained,” rather than a specific one “requiring safety belts,” does not create a sufficiently specific standard
  • \Negligence per se applies when there has been a violation of a specific requirement of a law.\
  • “Negligence per se applies when there has been a violation of 3 a specific requirement of a law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lankford, Gemmill, Sult

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.