Hutsell v. Current

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania have assumed that fraudulent joinder doctrine applies to a diverse forum defendant
• reasoning that it would be improper to consider defendant’s certifications because they would be excluded from a Rule 12(b)(6) inquiry, which is more searching than fraudulent joinder analysis
• reasoning that it would be improper to consider defendant’s certifications because they would be excluded from a Rule 12(b)(6) inquiry, which is more searching than fraudulent joinder analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).