Skip to main content
· 5/21/1888

Hutchinson v. Welch

Citations

  • 2 Monag. 513
  • 14 A. 328
  • 1888 Pa. LEXIS 781

Syllabus

<p>In an action of ejectment, a rescission of a contract of sale of real estate was held by the court below not sufficiently proved by the parol evidence, and the supreme court affirmed the judgment.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.